I spent some time playing with the new type of container in Kubernetes and came up with a post and a few challenging yet fun practical exercises that may help you master the new feature faster π
Kubernetes 1.28 introduced a new type of container - "native" sidecars. Why this addition was needed? How do the new sidecar containers compare to regular and init containers? What use cases does this new type of container enable? And most importantly, how can I get my hands dirty with the hot new feature? Let's find out!
First, a potentially disturbing surprising fact: the 1.28 release didn't add a new Sidecar
type or even a sidecarContainers
field to the Pod spec - the so-called "native sidecar" containers are just the same old init containers but with some new properties, which make them behave unlike any other type of containers. At first glance, this may seem like a bad design decision, but when you wrap your head around it, you'll see that it's actually a clever and future-proof solution to a rather delicate architectural problem.
Before diving into the details of the new sidecar containers, let's quickly recap the original difference between the regular and init containers in Kubernetes.
Every Pod must have at least one regular container defined in its .spec.containers
list. When a Pod has multiple regular containers, they all start and run concurrently, and if some of the Pod's containers terminate, they become subject to the Pod-wide restart policy:
Multiple concurrent and restartable containers deployed together as a single "unit" is a powerful abstraction, but there are also situations when some of the containers in such a group may need to:
Enforcing the startup order of regular containers is tricky but doable - a bunch of ugly-looking shell scripts usually do the trick. However, running some of the containers to completion while keeping others restartable is a much harder problem to solve. Simply setting the restart policy to OnFailure
is not good enough because when one of the regular containers terminates, the Pod stops being ready, meaning that it's no longer able to serve traffic even if its primary container is still up and running.
A proper solution was needed to address the above problems, and that's how the init containers were born.
Since a while ago, the Kubernetes Pod spec has gotten another list - .spec.initContainers
:
Even though the elements of this new list have a literally identical set of attributes to the regular containers, the init containers behave differently.
Init containers:
...and because of the above design, init containers:
Always
- init containers then fallback to OnFailure
.Historically, init containers were used to perform some auxiliary "one-off" tasks before the main application container startup:
But there is more auxiliary functionality that is beneficial to keep outside of the main application container but still in the same Pod:
And such functionality doesn't fit the init container model because the above containers:
Expectedly, over time, another architectural pattern, perfectly describing the above requirements, emerged - Sidecar Containers. However, up until the 1.28 release, sidecars in Kubernetes were implemented using regular containers. But, since there is no startup order guarantee for regular containers, and there is just one restart policy to rule them all, engineers had to come up with various workarounds to make sidecar containers behave as expected.
So, how has Kubernetes 1.28 changed the situation?
The 1.28 release didn't add a new Sidecar
type or even a .spec.sidecarContainers
list. Instead, it introduced a new restartPolicy
attribute for... containers!
In addition to the Pod-wide restart policy, now containers can have their own restart policy, but only if:
Always
.So, what's the difference between traditional init and init containers with the restartPolicy: Always
attribute?
The new type of init containers:
In other words, the only "true init" thing about the new type of containers is that they still respect the startup order. The rest of the behavior seems very different (if not opposite) to the traditional init logic. However, the new behavior is exactly what one would expect from a Sidecar container.
Yes, it's not the most obvious way to achieve the desired behavior. But this design paves the way to a more advanced type of containers - KEP-753: Sidecar containers explains the motivation for reusing the initContainers
list and even mentions a new type of container called infrastructureContainers
, which might be used to unify the behavior of the old init and new Sidecar containers in the future:
Here's how the new behavior can be visualized using a single Pod with carefully crafted containers:
And now, for the most exciting part! I've prepared a few challenging yet fun problems to help you better internalize your knowledge of sidecars. Ready to tackle them? Then continue on at iximiuz Labs π
Building labs.iximiuz.com - a place to help you learn Containers and Kubernetes the fun way π
Hey, fellow server dweller π Ivan here with an exciting iximiuz Labs update! The month isn't over yet, so it's not quite time for the traditional monthly roundup. However, there have been so many updates on the platform in the past couple of weeks that they couldn't possibly fit into a single email. So, let's dive in π Backend Revamp: Faster, Smarter, Stronger Over the past few weeks, I rolled out a significant backend rewrite at iximiuz Labs, and I couldn't be more excited to share the...
Hello π Ivan's here with November's roundup of all things Linux, Containers, Kubernetes, and Server Side π§ What I was working on This month was (extremely) development-heavy. Two-thirds of it went into the implementation of custom playground machinery and a new Kubernetes "Omni" playground, and in the last part, I was unexpectedly busy with expanding the platform's capacity and launching a new server in India π The latter became possible thanks to the support of all of you who got the premium...
Hello, fellow server dweller π I've got two exciting announcements to make. Starting with the shorter one, this year, I decided to give Black Friday a try. This is an experiment - iximiuz Labs hasn't done sales before and won't have any in the foreseeable future, at least not until next November. So, if you wanted to get a premium membership but the price felt too high, this is your rare chance to get it with a 50% discount. The offer is limited to exactly one week. Now, to the second, much...